The Financial Conduct Authority has begun High Court proceedings against Osborne Baldwin Limited, which trades as Hunter Jones and Hunter Jones Group.
In a statement published on 21 September, the regulator alleged that Hunter Jones sells loan notes and carries out regulated activity without FCA authorisation.
The FCA is asking the court to stop the company from carrying out regulated activity and to require money to be returned to investors.
What has been verified
The FCA has confirmed that proceedings have been started against Osborne Baldwin Limited, that the company trades as Hunter Jones and Hunter Jones Group, and that the alleged activity involves selling loan notes.
The regulator says it is seeking an order stopping the alleged unauthorised activity and requiring investor money to be returned.
Allegations, not findings
The proceedings are at an early stage. The court has not determined the FCA's claim, and no trial date has been set.
That distinction is important. The FCA's allegations should not be presented as established findings, and the start of proceedings does not determine their eventual outcome.
Why authorisation matters
The FCA warned that consumers dealing with unauthorised firms face greater risks and may lose access to important regulatory protections if something goes wrong.
Authorisation does not eliminate investment risk or guarantee that investors will recover their money. It does, however, place regulated firms within a framework of conduct, supervision and accountability.
The regulator recommends checking a business through its Firm Checker before committing money.
What concerned investors can do
Anyone who has invested through Hunter Jones and is concerned about the proceedings can use the contact details provided in the FCA's official announcement.
Investors should preserve agreements, statements, emails, payment records and promotional materials. They should be cautious about unsolicited approaches from businesses claiming they can recover money for an upfront fee.
No court outcome or repayment process has yet been announced.
The Apolifina view
This case illustrates why the legal status of an investment provider matters as much as the advertised return.
Loan notes can involve substantial risks, including the possibility of losing the full investment. A prominent website, professional marketing or a stated fixed return does not establish that a firm is authorised or that an investment is protected.
The safest first step is verification through the FCA's own tools, followed by a careful review of how the investment works, where the money goes and what protections actually apply.
Uncertainty
The court has not determined whether the FCA's allegations are correct. There is no trial date, judgment or confirmed timetable for returning money to investors.
Further information may be released as the proceedings progress.
Primary sources and verification
The parties, allegations, remedy sought and status of the proceedings were checked against the FCA's announcement published on 21 September 2026.
Continue reading: The FCA warning on mini-bonds and loan notes · How clone-firm scams work · How to choose an investment platform